Narlin's mouthful

Blog #1 Jan Van Eyck and the Northern Renaissance

Posted by: narlinswords on: September 23, 2009

Van Eyck Arnolfini Portrait Jan Van Eyck, The Arnolfini Portrait, oil on wood, 1434, Bruges
(National Gallery, London)

Jan Van Eyck was a famous artist during the Northern Renaissance.   This painting in particular is considered one of the most original and complex paintings in Western art history.  The painting was done in oils rather than tempura, and is noted to be one of the first of its kind.   Van Eyck had a special talent for bringing detail and light into his work.

The painting is assumed to be created for Giovanni di Nicolao Arnolfini and his wife.  Giovanni was a merchant who was born in Lucca to a wealthy family and moved to Bruges in Flanders when he was very young.  He worked for the family business trading precious items such as silks and tapestries.  There is some speculation as to which Arnolfini is pictured in this piece.  The painting itself has several names such as “The Arnolfini Wedding”, “The Arnolfini Marriage”, “The Arnolfini Double Portrait” or the “Portrait of Giovanni Arnolfini and his Wife”.

There were approximately five Arnolfinis living in Bruges around the time this piece was commissioned.  It is believed Giovanni di Nicolao was the most likely candidate since he was around for several years prior to 1434, and therefore would have had time to become well acquanted with Van Eyck.  He was also wed to Costanza Trenta, who also came from a wealthy family in Lucca, in 1426.  She would have been approximately 21 years old when the painting was done.  However, she passed away in 1433, and it is speculated the painting is a reminder of their marriage for Giovanni.

The Arnolfinis were related to the Medicis and most likely did banking through their Bruges branch.  Costanza’s mother, Bartolomea, was the daughter of Giovanni di Amerigo Cavalcanti.  He was a Florentine of notable stature and well acquanted with the Medicis. In 1416, Bartolomea’s sister was married to Lorenzo de’Medici. It is through this family connection that the death of Costanza is known. On February 26, 1433, Bartolomea writes from Lucca to Lorenzo de’Medici to congratulate them on the birth of their son, and to inform them of the death of her daughter Costanza.

Van Eyck had such an amazing talent for realism and attention to detail.  This painting has several symbolic meanings all related to the couple and their marriage.  For example, the two figures are exquisitely dressed and surrounded by items that represent wealth.  Even the oranges on the table by the window are extremely rare and costly.  Many people think Costanza is pregnant from the way her dress gathers at the stomach and her hand placement, though it is actually just the style of dress from that time.  There is a carved figure of Saint Margaret on the bedpost, who is the patron saint of pregnancy and childbirth.  The artist’s signature on the back wall is speculated to be a witness signature for the wedding, and the images reflected in the mirror are thought to be the two witnesses as well.   It is thought that Van Eyck used a magnifying glass to paint the minute details.

I enjoy discovering new items in this painting every time I see it.  There is a lot of speculation about each item, and worth the time to research.  The painting is so rich in detail and symbolizes their love and unity in marriage.  I like the portrayal of the sanctity of their union and the permanent reminder of the love they shared.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnolfini_Portrait

http://www.smarthistory.org/Van-Eyck.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Arnolfini

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0PAL/is_499_158/ai_109131988/pg_4/

Advertisement

6 Responses to "Blog #1 Jan Van Eyck and the Northern Renaissance"

Your blog was very informative. You provided lots of great information. I also agree that Van Eyck was a talented painter who paid great attention to detail. This painting is full of symbolism and I took your advice and looked some of it up. I thought it was very interesting. For example the dog could symbolize loyalty or lust. The color of the dress and cap symbolize hope and purity. Like you, I also see something new every time I look at the painting. Like the cherry tree outside the window which symbolizes love. I did have to enlarge the picture quite a bit to see the tree, but it is there! You did a great job providing good, solid information as well as explaining some of the symbolism in the painting. Good job and I enjoyed your blog!

Fabulous background information on this piece. I hope you put some tags on your post, so others can find this post when they are performing a search.

Thanks for the information on this composition. I have enjoyed Bach’s music. I like the pace and the way that it builds throughout. I also really enjoyed the pictures that went with it in the video clip. They seemed appropriate and added to the visual impact of listening to the music.

I chose to comment on your blog because I found it so informative and well written. The theory that this portrait was painted as a remembrance for a widow of his departed young wife was very interesting and rather sad. I appreciate the insight you provided that the elements in the painting are all place for symbolic purpose. Prior to taking this art class I had no experience with this artist. I now feel so fortunate to have been exposed to Jan Van Eyck, The Arnolfini Portrait. Because of the amazing detail in this piece and because of your insight I predict it will be one of my favorite paintings from the Northern Renaissance era.

I am pleased that you chose to cite your references. Doing so not only provides the blog with creditability it gives the reader easy access to more information. I have only one critical comment, there is some conflicting information presented. In paragraph #2 you do mention that this painting was done in oil rather than tempera… but in the opening line you state Van Eyck, The Arnolfini Portrait, tempera and oil on wood, 1434. I enjoyed reading your blog and I will return often during the course of this class to benefit from the research you do for the other assignments. Good luck with your studies
-max

That indeed was a ton of information. The professor could have put a link to your blog as a learning path. As a person of dutch heritage I can “feel” the personalities presented by Van Eyck in the way he painted them. If the faces were different they could be my great-grandparents.

I also enjoy the detail and dark lighting and shading of this painting. I like how the faces and clothing are the brightest features of the painting, drawing attention to the Arnolfinis as the subject of the work. The shading is very well done, displaying depth and richness, and making the painting look very realistic.

This post is full of excellent background information about the painting, Van Eyck, and the Arnolfinis. You tied in the context and time period of the work very well, and added lots of facts that go above and beyond the requirements for the assignment.

I think you could have talked a bit more specifically about what aspects of the painting caught your eye, all you mentioned was the “detail”, but you didn’t elaborate. However, I like your personal connection to the subject of the painting.

Your post seems to be cited thoroughly, and you made a great connection between the Arnolfinis and the Medicis. However, you didn’t elaborate on the relationship between these families and the arts during the Renaissance.

I enjoyed your intelligent comments and knowledgeable take on this painting. I wonder if perhaps the drab colors surrounding the couple on the day of their wedding (which is supposed to be a bright time), and the looks of seriousness and sadness on their faces was requested by Giovanni Arnolfini to illustrate the sorrow he felt for his lost wife pictured here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


  • None
  • Kim Groff-Harrington: Wow! Kim Groff-Harringotn here! Thank you! I have rarely googled myslef! Thank you for the good words."]
  • emilymbass: Very interesting information for me. I never knew of this art form. I shared the video with my son and he thought it was weird to see the puppeteer. H
  • deheartforart: I share your mixed feelings about Impressionism. Your example, however, in one that I genuinely like. It does a remarkable job of capturing maternal

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.